<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing and Public Relations &#8211; Nothing but lies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prmeetsmarketing.com/2009/10/11/marketing-and-public-relations-nothing-but-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prmeetsmarketing.com/2009/10/11/marketing-and-public-relations-nothing-but-lies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:06:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: csalomonlee</title>
		<link>http://www.prmeetsmarketing.com/2009/10/11/marketing-and-public-relations-nothing-but-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>csalomonlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prmeetsmarketing.wordpress.com/?p=1023#comment-600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mgreshamuo thanks for the comments and it is sometimes interesting to hear why some firms will take the cases that you outlined.

@topher agreed and as a result, the &quot;damage&quot; was minimized from a PR perspective. On the homefront, that&#039;s a different issue altogether. And yes, the word sorry is no longer what is used to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mgreshamuo thanks for the comments and it is sometimes interesting to hear why some firms will take the cases that you outlined.</p>
<p>@topher agreed and as a result, the &#8220;damage&#8221; was minimized from a PR perspective. On the homefront, that&#8217;s a different issue altogether. And yes, the word sorry is no longer what is used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topher</title>
		<link>http://www.prmeetsmarketing.com/2009/10/11/marketing-and-public-relations-nothing-but-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prmeetsmarketing.wordpress.com/?p=1023#comment-599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree that the success of David Letterman&#039;s &quot;apology&quot; was that it came across as sincere and without attempt to shift responsibility. Hopefully, this episode has truly changed him... who knows...

The thing that continually frustrates me is that it has become a culture where apologies do not mean a true contrition regarding the action, but more of a &quot;I&#039;m so very sorry I got caught. I promise to be better at concealing next time.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that the success of David Letterman&#8217;s &#8220;apology&#8221; was that it came across as sincere and without attempt to shift responsibility. Hopefully, this episode has truly changed him&#8230; who knows&#8230;</p>
<p>The thing that continually frustrates me is that it has become a culture where apologies do not mean a true contrition regarding the action, but more of a &#8220;I&#8217;m so very sorry I got caught. I promise to be better at concealing next time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgreshamuo</title>
		<link>http://www.prmeetsmarketing.com/2009/10/11/marketing-and-public-relations-nothing-but-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>mgreshamuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prmeetsmarketing.wordpress.com/?p=1023#comment-598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sincere ethical behavior is sometimes expensive, costing a negative dip in image. PR is often too concerned with presence rather than doing what is deemed ethical. and that&#039;s where the PR industry&#039;s ethical dilemma begins.

There is no ethical way to help the tobacco industry increase market share for a product that kills its customers. There is no ethical way to protect polluters, sweatshops and makers of defective products while they continue to practice business as usual, and there is no ethical way to harass and censor journalists whose reporting threatens a client&#039;s controversial product.

Many, if not all, of the major public relations firms, engage in these types of offensive practices. They don&#039;t do it because they are evil people. They do it because their wealthy clients have problems, and cleaning up their image is often easier (and cheaper) than cleaning up their mess.

Ethics will always seem to take a back seat. I personally believe there is a boiling point in which a practitioner&#039;s ethical limit will be reached. Most people have a conscious mind of what is grossly unethical. For example, people are going to use tobacco no matter what, one voice isn&#039;t going to necessarily be heard; however, once their personal decisions become unethical, I feel most people have the strength and dignity to realize, and change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sincere ethical behavior is sometimes expensive, costing a negative dip in image. PR is often too concerned with presence rather than doing what is deemed ethical. and that&#8217;s where the PR industry&#8217;s ethical dilemma begins.</p>
<p>There is no ethical way to help the tobacco industry increase market share for a product that kills its customers. There is no ethical way to protect polluters, sweatshops and makers of defective products while they continue to practice business as usual, and there is no ethical way to harass and censor journalists whose reporting threatens a client&#8217;s controversial product.</p>
<p>Many, if not all, of the major public relations firms, engage in these types of offensive practices. They don&#8217;t do it because they are evil people. They do it because their wealthy clients have problems, and cleaning up their image is often easier (and cheaper) than cleaning up their mess.</p>
<p>Ethics will always seem to take a back seat. I personally believe there is a boiling point in which a practitioner&#8217;s ethical limit will be reached. Most people have a conscious mind of what is grossly unethical. For example, people are going to use tobacco no matter what, one voice isn&#8217;t going to necessarily be heard; however, once their personal decisions become unethical, I feel most people have the strength and dignity to realize, and change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
